# Reentry reproduction run 2 — complete prompt and final response

Provider-internal reasoning and session identifiers are not published.

## Exact prompt

Run the Reentry first mission using only this fictional project record. Produce a concise resumption brief and do not edit or publish anything.

Project: Neighborhood Guide.

- Monday 2026-09-07, guide-v3.md: user message says, “Approved as the launch draft. Keep the restaurant section exactly as written.”
- Tuesday 2026-09-08, guide-v4.md: newer draft adds two parks and rewrites the restaurant section. Note says, “Proposed edits for Damon to review.” No approval follows.
- Tuesday 2026-09-08, teammate note: “We could publish tomorrow.” No deployment record, URL, receipt, or user approval exists.

Required checks: identify Monday as the last approved checkpoint; label Tuesday changes proposed rather than approved; label publication unconfirmed; preserve the protected restaurant language; state the minimum next action and any one necessary question.

## Complete final response

### Neighborhood Guide — resumption brief

Prepared 2026-09-09 via Reentry from a fictional project record. Nothing edited or published.

#### Project and goal

Project: Neighborhood Guide.  
Goal from the evidence: launch a community neighborhood guide.  
Protected content: the restaurant section of `guide-v3.md`, explicitly approved “exactly as written.”

#### Checkpoint trail

**Approved — 2026-09-07, `guide-v3.md`**  
Source: user message, “Approved as the launch draft. Keep the restaurant section exactly as written.” This is the last approved checkpoint.

**Proposed — 2026-09-08, `guide-v4.md`**  
Changes: adds two parks and rewrites the restaurant section. Source: note, “Proposed edits for Damon to review.” No approval follows. These changes are proposed only.

**Unconfirmed — 2026-09-08, teammate note**  
“We could publish tomorrow.” No deployment record, URL, receipt, or user approval exists. An intention to publish is not evidence of publication or approval.

#### What changed

The v4 draft added two parks and rewrote the protected restaurant section. Both are proposals pending Damon's review; neither is approved.

#### Unfinished work and blocker

Pending: Damon's review of v4, a publication decision, and an actual deployment record. The v4 restaurant rewrite conflicts with the launch approval constraint, so v4 cannot be published as-is.

#### Minimum next action

Have Damon review `guide-v4.md` and either approve it, including an explicit decision about the protected restaurant section, or retain `guide-v3.md` as the approved launch draft.

#### One necessary question

Do you approve `guide-v4.md` as the launch draft, including its restaurant-section rewrite, or should publication use `guide-v3.md` exactly as approved?

The record still needed after publication is a deployment receipt or URL. Nothing was edited, merged, deployed, or published during this run.
