Back to Test Records
Reproduced

Reentry restores the last approved checkpoint

Two exact-package runs kept a newer proposal separate from approved work

Material supplied

The Bot begins with disclosed inputs

The project, filenames, messages, and publication note are fictional. The fixture tests whether a newer file is incorrectly promoted to approved status.

Fictional project record

The dated drafts, approval message, proposal note, and acceptance checks.

Download file
Run request

Instructions for repeating this run

Use this request with the disclosed input file above. The complete preserved prompt, including the fixture, is in the linked transcript.

Run the Reentry first mission using only this fictional project record. Produce a concise resumption brief and do not edit or publish anything. Identify Monday as the last approved checkpoint; label Tuesday changes proposed rather than approved; label publication unconfirmed; preserve the protected restaurant language; state the minimum next action and one necessary question.
Conversation evidence

What the record currently contains

The full second-run prompt and response are published in the transcript. The first complete result is preserved separately.

Person · excerpt

Resume from an approved Monday draft, a newer but unapproved Tuesday draft, and an unsupported suggestion that publication might happen.

Bot · excerpt

Both runs retained Monday as the approved checkpoint, labeled Tuesday proposed, marked publication unconfirmed, and kept the protected restaurant language in force.

Read the complete second-run transcriptThe complete request and final response from the earlier reproduced run.
Starter package

The files used to set up this Bot

These are the Bot profile and readable setup files. They are separate from any finished result produced during a run.

Inspect the run summary

The final archive fingerprint and recorded runtime details.

Download file

Download the tested Reentry profile

The archived version 2.0.0 profile used in both final validation runs.

Download file

Inspect the tested Reentry files

The archived readable package corresponding to the tested profile.

Download file
Human decisions

The Bot prepares work; a person remains responsible

  1. 1

    Decide whether any proposed Tuesday edit should supersede the approved draft.

  2. 2

    Confirm whether protected language may change.

  3. 3

    Approve publication and retain a deployment record.

Evidence ledger

Separate checks for separate claims

Package, import, role-run, reproduction, and human-review status are reported independently.

Package checksPassed

The generated archive and readable package passed the repository package checks.

Checked 2026-09-09
Profile importPassed

The exact Reentry 2.0.0 archive imported with its bundled Skill present.

Checked 2026-09-09
Role runPassed

The first run met every disclosed status and approval check.

Checked 2026-09-09
ReproductionPassed

The same profile, fixture, and request passed the disclosed checks in a second independent run.

Checked 2026-09-09
Human technical reviewUnavailable

A human technical review is a possible long-term goal. Bot Cabinet cannot offer one at this time.

Preserved evidence

Review the record behind this result

The disclosed transcript, finished file, run details, cost note, and reproduction checks form the record for this result.

Return to all test records